Skip to main content

Trans-Atlantic Drift in Foreign Policies of The EU and the USA on Israel-Palestine

By Paulius Svetukaitis and Mathieu Panarotto

This blog post was written for the course "Current Issues in Global and EU Affairs", which took place from February 12-April 30, 2018.

A photo of the press taking photographs and various dignitaries posing and applauding in front of a stone wall bearing a large stone seal of the US government. Next to the wall is a temporary banner reading 'Embassy of the United States, Jerusalem, Israel.'
The dedication ceremony for the US Embassy in Jerusalem
Image credit: The White House via Wikimedia Commons
The decision by the US to transfer its embassy in Israel to Jerusalem has not been met with endorsement by the European Union. Although the external action was more unified in comparison to the invasion of Iraq in 2003, some Member States remain deviant in broader multilateral fora.

Although current US foreign policy towards Israel-Palestine infringed “Phase III”1 of the “Roadmap for Peace” initiated by the “Middle East Quartet”, it does not rule-out the idea of a two-state solution nor the idea of Jerusalem as capital of both states. However, Trump’s decision challenges both the US long-term commitment and credibility to find consensus-based solution, and the role of the international community in the peace process.

Historically, the Israel-Palestine problem has been an issue where EU and US standpoints would follow the same political line, but now it puts the EU institutions and its Member States under pressure. By taking an unprecedented stance, Trump throws the ball directly at the EU and it clearly has a divisive effect. HR/VP - Federica Mogherini reaffirmed the strong believe that the best solution for both parties (Israel and Palestine) would include Jerusalem as capital of both. In the meantime, she was frustrated by Hungary which vetoed a statement the EU intended to produce to express concerns about the US decision2. Where one could think that the EU had a relatively unified approach to the crisis of embassy relocation until the Iraq war in 2003, this stance is now less coordinated at broader fora where Czech Republic, Latvia, Croatia, Poland, Romania joined Hungary in abstaining to dismissing Trump’s action3.

In conclusion, the US and the EU have now taken different approaches in dealing with the Israel-Palestine issue. While the EU remains consistent in its policies and committed to a multilateral problem-solving agenda, the US has opted for a unilateral approach, which seems to have been met positively only by Israel and created a unanimous backlash by the international community that does not help the peace process.

Footnotes

1Performance-Based Roadmap to a Permanent Two-State Solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. p, 6. Online: www.globalpolicy.org. Available: https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/189-israel-palestine/38357-the-road-map.html.
2http://www.ecfr.eu/article/commentary_eu_backed_into_a_corner_on_israel_palestine
3http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/un-jerusalem-vote-live-updates-latest-news-general-assembly-us-israel-capital-donald-trump-a8122641.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Visiting KU Leuven: First Meetings and New Friends

By Victoria Prince Illinois students and staff explore Brussels with representatives from Leuven Our semester of exploring transatlantic relations happened not only in two separate classrooms across the world, but were intertwined when students from each side were able to personally travel this distance. I was fortunate enough to be a part of the University of Illinois delegation that traveled to Leuven, Belgium to meet our international classmates in person. The trip was filled with amazing experiences and unforgettable people that have made a huge impact on me and whom I hope to maintain friendships with throughout my lifetime. I would say that the first full day of the program best exemplifies how incredible the entire journey was. On the Monday morning of our trip, we met in person with the professors of our course and the five students that would be our counterparts traveling to the United States a few weeks later. We saw the diversity in the student body and the impressiv...

Sport and Economics: Sports Investment as Part of the Transatlantic Relationship

by Viktoria Loidl (University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign) This blog post was written for the course "Current Issues in Global and EU Affairs", which took place from February 11-May 9, 2019. Eden Hazard (Chelsea) taking on Jonny Howson (Norwich City) Image Credit: Ben Sutherland, via Wikimedia Commons Sport is not only good for our bodies but also the economy and transatlantic relations between the European Union and the United States of America. The sports industry is a large and fast-growing sector. Additionally, it creates a multitude of employment opportunities and contributes to EU gross value added. In sum, the industry contributes about € 294 billion to the EU’s gross value added and employs roughly 4.5 million people throughout a variety of different sub-industries. As roughly 3% of employment in the EU are within sport-related industries, the EU actively promotes growth in this sector through tourism, media, fit...

Going for Gold: Utilizing Rising Sports Markets to Fill the Gap in Transatlantic Relations

by Arthur Maximilian John and Kasey Golding (KU Leuven) This blog post was written for the course "Current Issues in Global and EU Affairs", which took place from February 11-May 9, 2019. Build-up to the 2010 NFL International Series Game at Wembley Stadium between the Denver Broncos and the San Francisco 49ers Image Credit: Flickr user 'Thomas' via Wikimedia Commons From debates over NATO and defense spending to major international agreements such as the Iran Nuclear Deal and the Paris Climate Agreement, it is no surprise that the high political discussions of the transatlantic relationship have been going through a rough patch.   Just a quick Google News search reveals the current struggles of one of the strongest geopolitical relationships of the last five decades. Wherever we look we seem to find more and more reasons to believe that Europe and the US are heading down a dangerous path—one in which we might even see the two venture ...