Skip to main content

Trans-Atlantic Drift in Foreign Policies of The EU and the USA on Israel-Palestine

By Paulius Svetukaitis and Mathieu Panarotto

 This blog post was written for the course "Current Issues in Global and EU Affairs", which took place from February 12-April 30, 2018.

A photo of the press taking photographs and various dignitaries posing and applauding in front of a stone wall bearing a large stone seal of the US government. Next to the wall is a temporary banner reading 'Embassy of the United States, Jerusalem, Israel.'
The dedication ceremony for the US Embassy in Jerusalem
Image credit: The White House via Wikimedia Commons
The decision by the US to transfer its embassy in Israel to Jerusalem has not been met with endorsement by the European Union. Although the external action was more unified in comparison to the invasion of Iraq in 2003, some Member States remain deviant in broader multilateral fora.

Although current US foreign policy towards Israel-Palestine infringed “Phase III”1 of the “Roadmap for Peace” initiated by the “Middle East Quartet”, it does not rule-out the idea of a two-state solution nor the idea of Jerusalem as capital of both states. However, Trump’s decision challenges both the US long-term commitment and credibility to find consensus-based solution, and the role of the international community in the peace process.

Historically, the Israel-Palestine problem has been an issue where EU and US standpoints would follow the same political line, but now it puts the EU institutions and its Member States under pressure. By taking an unprecedented stance, Trump throws the ball directly at the EU and it clearly has a divisive effect. HR/VP - Federica Mogherini reaffirmed the strong believe that the best solution for both parties (Israel and Palestine) would include Jerusalem as capital of both. In the meantime, she was frustrated by Hungary which vetoed a statement the EU intended to produce to express concerns about the US decision2. Where one could think that the EU had a relatively unified approach to the crisis of embassy relocation until the Iraq war in 2003, this stance is now less coordinated at broader fora where Czech Republic, Latvia, Croatia, Poland, Romania joined Hungary in abstaining to dismissing Trump’s action3.

In conclusion, the US and the EU have now taken different approaches in dealing with the Israel-Palestine issue. While the EU remains consistent in its policies and committed to a multilateral problem-solving agenda, the US has opted for a unilateral approach, which seems to have been met positively only by Israel and created a unanimous backlash by the international community that does not help the peace process.

Footnotes

1Performance-Based Roadmap to a Permanent Two-State Solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. p, 6. Online: www.globalpolicy.org. Available: https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/189-israel-palestine/38357-the-road-map.html.
2http://www.ecfr.eu/article/commentary_eu_backed_into_a_corner_on_israel_palestine
3http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/un-jerusalem-vote-live-updates-latest-news-general-assembly-us-israel-capital-donald-trump-a8122641.html
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Trump, the EU, and NATO

by Allison Wheeler (University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign) This blog post was written for the course "Current Issues in Global and EU Affairs", which took place from February 11-May 9, 2019. Secretary Pompeo and Secretary General Stoltenberg deliver opening remarks at the NATO Foreign Ministerial Image Credit: US Department of State/Ron Przysucha,  Public Domain This year, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), celebrated its 70 th birthday.   Founded in 1949, NATO has bound western Europe and North America since almost immediately following World War II and has created a close defense alliance between what has grown from just 12 countries to now 29 countries.   NATO at this moment in history is at the center of a potentially pivotal conflict for the transatlantic partnership between the US and the EU. The EU, regarded most prominently and historically as a normative and economic power, has heavily relied on the “hard power” th...
1 comment
Read more

Whaling as a pioneer in transatlantic trade

By Danilo Dovgoborets and Weibin Han This blog post was written for the course "Current Issues in Global and EU Affairs", which took place from February 12-April 30, 2018. A Currier & Ives print depicting a whaling expedition Image credit: Library of Congress via Wikimedia Commons British academic Paul Gilroy in his seminal work The Black Atlantic (1993) explores the role slavery played in transatlantic relations and the capitalist system. Besides the triangular slave trade between Europe, Africa and the Americas, another industry that emerged in the picture is whaling , trade that was dominated by the Inuit (Eskimo) of eastern and western North America even before the Europeans’ arrival. Stephanie Pettigrew and Elizabeth Mancke (2018) have suggested that Dano-Norwegian claims on Greenland fisheries shaped the early modern North-Atlantic geopolitics. It affected the establishment of European settlements in North America and their later integration into Euro-Atla...
Post a Comment
Read more

NATO and the Transatlantic Relationship

by Jordan Evans-Kaplan (University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign) This blog post was written for the course "Current Issues in Global and EU Affairs", which took place from February 11-May 9, 2019. NATO Military Spending by member state GDP. Image Credit: Creative Commons The EU has always been and will likely always be the most key strategic partner to the US regarding NATO. However, the future of NATO remains cloudy amid a disruptive US presidency, and critiques of NATO on both sides of the Atlantic. Despite opposition and naysayers, it is quite an achievement of the European project that NATO has managed to exist this long, as it represents a solution to a problem from a bygone era. Created as a bulwark against Soviet aggression, this strategic partnership has stood the test of time since its creation in 1949 and remains the cornerstone of US-EU military cooperation. But what does the future hold for this critical component of transatlantic integration? NATO’s...
Post a Comment
Read more